Jason Jensen / B.Eng. / E.I.T. / Edmonton
Mechanical thinking for work that has to stand up to review.
I help industrial and AI teams turn drawings, calculations, BOMs, and model outputs into traceable deliverables and defensible review decisions.
01 / Capabilities
Two ways to add useful technical capacity.
Different settings, one working standard: defined inputs, explicit assumptions, visible evidence, and an output someone can use.
01
Industrial and consulting teams
Mechanical project and documentation support
CAD, drawing, BOM, calculation-sheet, and report support for industrial teams that need controlled outputs ready for internal review.
- CAD models, assemblies, drawings, and BOM support
- Drawing-package, revision, and source-data checks
- Calculation-sheet and technical-report support
02
AI labs and evaluation programs
Engineering-domain AI evaluation
Mechanical subject-matter review for model outputs and training tasks that need calculation checks, diagram review, and evidence-based feedback.
- Mechanical-engineering response evaluation
- Calculation, diagram, and multimodal review
- Rubric application and evidence-based feedback
02 / Selected evidence
A record built across design, operations, and technical quality.
BOM items after modularization on a CNG equipment co-op project.
Pressure-vessel drawings standardized across ASME, CSA, and PED requirements.
Synthetic mechanical workflow cases in the public evaluation repository.
Released evaluation-kernel baseline, with an active next-version pilot.
03 / Featured work
Mechanical Engineering Workflow Assurance Platform
A schema-first Python system that turns mechanical review requirements into reproducible gates, deterministic checks, weighted results, failure evidence, and immutable records. The repository includes a released evaluation-kernel baseline and an active package-assurance pilot.
04 / Two paths in
A site for project conversations and career conversations.
For clients and project teams
Need bounded technical capacity?
See the work I can support, the inputs that help, and the professional-practice boundary.Explore servicesFor employers and collaborators
Reviewing me for a role or team?
See the experience behind the profile, capability areas, and how I approach technical quality.Review experienceA practical starting point
Send the technical context. I'll respond with the fit.
A short brief is enough to define the likely boundary, a sensible first deliverable, and whether the work matches my background.